Monolingual, Bilingual and 'Bilingualised' Dictionaries: Which are More Effective, for What and for Whom? (Q10600): Difference between revisions
From LexBib
(Added qualifier: mention count (P92): 1) |
(Removed claim: LexBib v2 legacy ID (P1): Q1450) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Property / LexBib v2 legacy ID | |||
| Property / LexBib v2 legacy ID: Q1450 / rank | |||
| Property / contains term | |||
| Property / contains term: tense / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / contains term: tense / qualifier | |||
| Property / contains term | |||
| Property / contains term: tense / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / contains term: tense / qualifier | |||
| Property / contains term | |||
| Property / contains term: point / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / contains term: point / qualifier | |||
Latest revision as of 20:10, 23 August 2023
Publication by Laufer (1994)
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Monolingual, Bilingual and 'Bilingualised' Dictionaries: Which are More Effective, for What and for Whom? |
Publication by Laufer (1994) |
Statements
2
0 references
Batia Laufer
Laufer
0 references
565-576
0 references
Monolingual, Bilingual and 'Bilingualised' Dictionaries: Which are More Effective, for What and for Whom? (English)
0 references
1994
0 references
