There Is No Need for the Terms Polysemy and Homonymy in Lexicography (Q7621): Difference between revisions
From LexBib
(Added qualifier: mention count (P92): 2) |
(Removed claim: LexBib v2 legacy ID (P1): Q2500) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Property / LexBib v2 legacy ID | |||
Property / LexBib v2 legacy ID: Q2500 / rank | |||
Property / contains term | |||
Property / contains term: orthographic word / rank | |||
Property / contains term: orthographic word / qualifier | |||
Property / contains term | |||
Property / contains term: word sense / rank | |||
Property / contains term: word sense / qualifier | |||
Latest revision as of 19:32, 23 August 2023
Publication by Bergenholtz & Agerbo (2014)
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | There Is No Need for the Terms Polysemy and Homonymy in Lexicography |
Publication by Bergenholtz & Agerbo (2014) |
Statements
4
0 references
Henning Bergenholtz
Henning
Bergenholtz
0 references
Heidi Agerbo
Agerbo
0 references
1
0 references
27-35
0 references
There Is No Need for the Terms Polysemy and Homonymy in Lexicography (English)
0 references
24
0 references
1 January 2014
0 references