There Is No Need for the Terms Polysemy and Homonymy in Lexicography (Q7621): Difference between revisions

From LexBib
(‎Added qualifier: mention count (P92): 3)
(‎Removed claim: LexBib v2 legacy ID (P1): Q2500)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / LexBib v2 legacy ID
 
Property / LexBib v2 legacy ID: Q2500 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / contains term
 
Property / contains term: orthographic word / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / contains term: orthographic word / qualifier
 
Property / contains term
 
Property / contains term: word sense / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / contains term: word sense / qualifier
 
Property / contains term
 
Property / contains term: symbol / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / contains term: symbol / qualifier
 

Latest revision as of 19:32, 23 August 2023

Publication by Bergenholtz & Agerbo (2014)
Language Label Description Also known as
English
There Is No Need for the Terms Polysemy and Homonymy in Lexicography
Publication by Bergenholtz & Agerbo (2014)

    Statements

    0 references
    4
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1
    0 references
    27-35
    0 references
    There Is No Need for the Terms Polysemy and Homonymy in Lexicography (English)
    0 references
    24
    0 references
    1 January 2014
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references